Curbside Consults in Clinical Medicine: Empirical and Liability Challenges
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Winter 2021
Abstract
In most U.S. jurisdictions, clinicians providing informal “curbside” consults are protected from medical malpractice liability due to the absence of a doctor-patient relationship. A recent Minnesota Supreme Court case, Warren v. Dinter, offers the opportunity to reassess whether the majority rule is truly serving the best interests of patients.
Keywords
Medical Malpractice, Curbside Consultation, Informal Consultation, Doctor-Patient Relationship, Warren v. Dieter
Publication Title
Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics
Repository Citation
49 J. L., Med., & Ethics 599 (2021)