Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-13-2009
Abstract
The literature on the economics of copyright proceeds from the premise that copyrightable works constitute pure public goods, which is generally modeled by assuming that such works are nonexcludable and that the marginal cost of making additional copies is essentially zero. A close examination of the foundational literature on public goods theory reveals that the defining characteristic of public goods is instead the optimality criterion known as the “Samuelson condition,” which implies that the systematic bias toward underproduction is the result of the inability to induce consumers to reveal their preferences rather than the inability to exclude or price at marginal cost. Reframing the analysis in terms of the Samuelson condition also contradicts the hostility toward price discrimination reflected in much of the literature by implying that price discrimination is a necessary condition for optimality. At the same time, it implies that the producer need only appropriate the marginal benefits created by the public good, which in turn provides a basis for determining an optimal level of price discrimination that still permits consumers to retain some of the surplus. Moreover, broadening public good models to reflect the fact that copyrighted works often serve as imperfect substitutes for one another allows the number of works to be determined endogenously. In such impure public goods models, the systematic bias toward underproduction disappears, and price discrimination once again may (but need not necessarily) promote optimality.
Keywords
intellectual property, public goods, Samuelson condition, access-incentives tradeoff, hedonic characteristics, spatial competition
Publication Title
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Repository Citation
Conley, John P. and Yoo, Christopher S., "Nonrivalry and Price Discrimination in Copyright Economics" (2009). All Faculty Scholarship. 269.
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/269
Included in
Economic Theory Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Other Economics Commons, Technology and Innovation Commons
Publication Citation
157 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1801 (2009).