Steel Traps and Unattainable Aspirations: A Comment on Kress

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2006

Abstract

A response to Ken Kress, "Rotting with Their Rights On: Why the Criteria for Ending Commitment or Restraint of Liberty Need Not Be the Same as the Criteria for Initiating Commitment or Restraint of Liberty, and How the Restraint May Sometimes Justifiably Continue after its Prerequisites are No Longer Satisfied," 24 Behav. Sci. & L 573 (2006)

Publication Title

Behavioral Science & Law

Publication Citation

24 Behav. Sci. & L. 599 (2006)

Full text not available in Penn Law Legal Scholarship Repository.

Share

COinS