Title

A Reply to Professor Amy Sinden’s Critique of the “Cost-Benefit State”

Authors

John D. Graham
Paul R. Noe

Document Type

Online Essay

Publication Date

9-27-2016

Description

Cost-benefit analysis is the most preferable form of analysis, and it should continue to be employed for important regulatory decisions.

Keywords

Process, Chevron, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Regulation Analysis

Recommended Citation

Graham, John D. and Noe, Paul R., "A Reply to Professor Amy Sinden’s Critique of the “Cost-Benefit State”" (2016). The Regulatory Review - Opinion. 864.
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/regreview-opinion/864