Title

Concluding Thoughts on Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Public’s Impact in Rulemaking

Authors

Eugene Scalia

Document Type

Online Essay

Publication Date

9-27-2017

Description

The Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. EPA illustrates that the public has a serious role to play in the rulemaking process.

Keywords

Process, Administrative Law, Government Agencies, Public Comment, Rulemaking, Supreme Court

Recommended Citation

Scalia, Eugene, "Concluding Thoughts on Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Public’s Impact in Rulemaking" (2017). The Regulatory Review - Opinion. 1245.
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/regreview-opinion/1245