Document Type


Publication Date



The standards for resolving putative conflicts between federal laws are not always clear, and neither for that matter is the standard for determining what constitutes a federal law capable of superseding effect. The technique of setting federal norms of professional conduct on a decentralized basis by borrowing or incorporating state norms is increasingly troublesome to the extent that the borrowed state norms are disuniform and that they are being put to multiple remedial purposes. Federal legislation preempting state law of professional conduct is conceivable but hardly likely, particularly as the norms are pressed into duty for purposes other than professional discipline. Pending other steps that might lead to national uniformity, the answer for the federal courts may be a uniform set of norms directly regulating litigation conduct in all federal courts.


Professional Conduct, Professional Ethics, Federal Practice, State practice, Federal Conflicts, Professional Standards and Responsibility, Choice of Law, Model Code of Professional Responsibilit

Publication Title

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Publication Citation

19 Fordham Urb. L.J. 969 (1992).