In the future, administrative agencies will rely increasingly on digital automation powered by machine learning algorithms. Can U.S. administrative law accommodate such a future? Not only might a highly automated state readily meet longstanding administrative law principles, but the responsible use of machine learning algorithms might perform even better than the status quo in terms of fulfilling administrative law’s core values of expert decision-making and democratic accountability. Algorithmic governance clearly promises more accurate, data-driven decisions. Moreover, due to their mathematical properties, algorithms might well prove to be more faithful agents of democratic institutions. Yet even if an automated state were smarter and more accountable, it might risk being less empathic. Although the degree of empathy in existing human-driven bureaucracies should not be overstated, a large-scale shift to government by algorithm will pose a new challenge for administrative law: ensuring that an automated state is also an empathic one.
Administrative law, regulation, algorithmic governance, accuracy, autonomous systems, automation, artificial intelligence, AI, machine learning algorithms, big data, predictive analytics, decision-making, adjudicating by algorithm, rulemaking by robot, e-government, digital government, bias, empathy
150 Daedalus 104 (2021).
Administrative Law Commons, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Commons, Computer Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Robotics Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, Systems Engineering Commons