This article explores the input that non-Article III actors can and should have in the Supreme Court’s decision to reconsider a prior constitutional decision. It employs a model of constitutional decision-making that distinguishes between the articulation of constitutional meaning and the construction of constitutional doctrine to identify several different stages at which a court can adhere to or depart from precedent and examines the persuasive power of non-Article III input at each stage.
Roosevelt, Kermit, "Polyphonic Stare Decisis: Listening to non-Article III Actors" (2008). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 226.