Recent research has shown that state reporting to human rights monitoring bodies is associated with improvements in rights practices, calling into question earlier claims that self-reporting is inconsequential. Yet little work has been done to explore the theoretical mechanisms that plausibly account for this association. This Article systematically documents—across treaties, countries, and years—four mechanisms through which reporting can contribute to human rights improvements: elite socialization, learning and capacity building, domestic mobilization, and law development. These mechanisms have implications for the future of human rights treaty monitoring.
International law, human rights, international agreements, treaty body system, self-reporting systems, periodic review, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, socialization theory, treaty implementation, treaty compliance, reporting & responding, judicial enforcement of human rights
American Journal of International Law
Creamer, Cosette D. and Simmons, Beth A., "The Proof is in the Process: Self-Reporting Under International Human Rights Treaties" (2020). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 2145.
Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Relations Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons