Document Type


Publication Date



In this article, I draw upon economic theory and recent empirical work on the economic and fiscal effects of immigration to evaluate some recent proposals for immigration reform in terms of their effects on the economic welfare of natives in the United States. In particular, I consider the Reforming American Immigration for a Strong Economy (RAISE) Act, a bill that would cut immigration to half of its current level. President Donald Trump has endorsed the RAISE Act and has insisted that many of its provisions be part of any legislation legalizing the status of unauthorized immigrants granted relief under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. I compare this restrictionist proposal to the comprehensive immigration reform bill passed by the Senate in 2013, which would have liberalized admissions to the United States. I conclude that economic analysis militates in favor of liberalizing our immigration restrictions, as proposed in 2013, instead of imposing the drastic new restrictions proposed in the RAISE Act.


Law & economics, impacts of immigration, benefit/cost analysis, public goods, government spending, taxes, transfer payments, entitlements, family-sponsored & employer-sponsored visas, quotas, wage effects, job skills, path to citizenship

Publication Title

UC Davis Law Review

Publication Citation

52 UC Davis L. Rev. 111 (2018)