The core international human rights treaty bodies play an important role in monitoring implementation of human rights standards through consideration of states parties’ reports. Yet very little research explores how seriously governments take their reporting obligations. This article examines the reporting record of parties to the Convention against Torture, finding that report submission is heavily conditioned by the practices of neighboring countries and by a government’s human rights commitment and institutional capacity. This article also introduces original data on the quality and responsiveness of reports, finding that more democratic—and particularly newly democratic—governments tend to render higher quality reports.
International criminal law, human rights, humanitarian law, Convention against Torture, CAT reporting regime, crime against humanity, inhumane treatment, state responsibility, governmental reporting obligations, empirical research
Creamer, Cossette D. and Simmons, Beth A., "Ratification, Reporting, and Rights: Quality of Participation in the Convention against Torture" (2015). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1682.
Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Relations Commons, Law and Politics Commons, National Security Law Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Public Policy Commons