This article seeks to frame a short statement of purpose for corporate law on which all reasonable observers can agree. The statement, in order to succeed at its intended purpose, must satisfy two strict conditions: first, it must have enough content to be meaningful; second, it must be completely uncontroversial, both descriptively and normatively. The exercise, thus described, involves avoiding the issues that occupy center stage in discussions about corporate law while at the same time highlighting the discussants’ generally held presuppositions. Three closely interconnected issues arise. First, whether the statement of the purpose of corporate law should speak in terms of maximization and economic efficiency rather than settle for the less demanding notion of wealth enhancement. Second, whether the statement of purpose should be tied to the shareholder interest, or, to restate the issue in more familiar terms, whether the shareholder primacy principle should be incorporated into the statement of corporate law’s purpose. Third, whether the utility to be maximized should (or may) be framed as social welfare. The statement derived speaks in terms of “attempts” to maximize and avoids reference either to the shareholder interest, which is controversial, or to social welfare, which is substantively inappropriate. For meaningful content, the statement references the inherited doctrinal context of corporate law rather than economic theory.
Bratton, William W., "Framing a Purpose for Corporate Law" (2014). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1666.
Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Economic Theory Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons