By endorsing the use of a vaccine that makes the experience of puffing on a cigarette deeply distasteful, Lieber and Millum have taken the first few tentative steps into a future filled with medical interventions that manipulate individual preferences. It is tempting to embrace the careful arguments of “Preventing Sin” and celebrate the possibility that the profound individual and social costs of smoking will finally be tamed. Yet there is something unsettling about the possibility that parental discretion may be on the cusp of a radical expansion, one that involves a new and unexplored approach to behavior modification.
Medical ethics, Vaccine, vaccination, Sarah R. Leiber, Joseph Millumethics, smoking, behavior modification, parental control, medical coercion, medical manipulation of children’s choices, self-destructive decisions
Hastings Center Report
Feldman, Eric A., "Shots for Tots?" (2013). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carey Law. 1553.
Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Biotechnology Commons, Child Psychology Commons, Community Health and Preventive Medicine Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Health Policy Commons, Immunology and Infectious Disease Commons, Other Mental and Social Health Commons, Pharmaceutics and Drug Design Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons
43:3 Hastings Center Report 34-35 (May/June 2013).