This Article discusses Wynne v. Comptroller, a dormant Commerce Clause case against Maryland pending before the Supreme Court. We use economic analysis to rebut Maryland’s claim that its tax regime does not discriminate against interstate commerce. We also argue that the parties’ framing of the central issue in the case as whether the Constitution requires states to relieve double taxation draws focus away from the discrimination question, and therefore could undermine the Wynnes’ case and lead to unjustified narrowing of the dormant Commerce Clause. We also show how our approach to tax discrimination resolves many of the issues that seemed to trouble the Justices at oral argument.
Constitutional law, Supreme Court of the United States, Maryland, state and local income tax, internal consistency test, interstate and intra-state commerce, due process clause, uniform source, uniform residence, tax-induced competitive disadvantage, double taxation
State Tax Notes
Knoll, Michael S. and Mason, Ruth, "Wynne: It's Not About Double Taxation" (2015). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1519.
Constitutional Law Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Taxation-State and Local Commons