law and neuroscience, psychology, neurolaw, criminal responsibility, tort liability, evidence, brain, memory, injury, emotion, lie detection, judging, psychopathy, fMRI, EEG, decision making, neuroethics, bioethics, punishment, sentencing
President Obama charged the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues to identify a set of core ethical standards in the neuroscience domain, including the appropriate use of neuroscience in the criminal-justice system. The Commission, in turn, called for comments and recommendations. The MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience submitted a consensus statement, published here, containing 16 specific recommendations. These are organized within three main themes: 1) what steps should be taken to enhance the capacity of the criminal justice system to make sound decisions regarding the admissibility and weight of neuroscientific evidence?; 2) to what extent can the capacity of neurotechnologies to aid in the administration of criminal justice be enhanced through research?; and 3) in what additional ways might important ethical issues at the intersection of neuroscience and criminal justice be addressed?
Jones, Owen D.; Bonnie, Richard J.; Casey, B. J.; Davis, Andre; Faigman, David L.; Hoffman, Morris; Montague, Read; Morse, Stephen J.; Raichle, Marcus E.; Richeson, Jennifer A.; Scott, Elizabeth; Steinberg, Laurence; Taylor-Thompson, Kim; Wagner, Anthony; and Yaffe, Gideon, "Law and Neuroscience: Recommendations Submitted to the President's Bioethics Commission" (2014). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1439.
Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Evidence Commons, Law and Psychology Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Legal History Commons, Medical Neurobiology Commons, Neurology Commons, Neurosciences Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons