A Brief Sur-Reply to Professors Graetz and Warren

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-1-2013

Abstract

Professors Ruth Mason and Michael Knoll defend their interpretation of the tax-discrimination jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union, arguing that the nature of their project has been misunderstood by Professors Michael Graetz and Alvin Warren. In Mason and Knoll’s view, competitive neutrality remains the principle most plausibly guiding Court of Justice rulings on tax discrimination, and thereby illuminates the clearest way out of the doctrinal confusion in this field of law.

Keywords

ECJ, tax discrimination, competitive neutrality, CON, capital ownership neutrality, CEN, capital export neutrality

Publication Title

Yale Law Journal Forum

Link to Full Text

Link to SSRN

Share

COinS