Borderline Sovereignty Disorder: China and the Law and Politics of the China-India Territorial Disputes
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-25-2025
Abstract
International law is usually conducive to stability and peace. In the context of the China-India border and territorial disputes, however, international law exacerbates tensions and increases risks, as the incidents at the border in 2020 illustrate. Factors that explain this pattern include: the impossibility of ‘thick’ exercises of sovereignty in marginal, uninhabitable territory, the ambiguities of the human rights to self-determination of minority peoples and the dilemmas they pose for States’ central governments, China’s distinctive views on the invalidity of ‘unequal treaties,’ the relevance of various history-based claims to sovereignty, and the special place of the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence in international law. These law-related problems are compounded by political aspects of the border and territorial disputes and China-India relations, including: rising nationalism in both States, concentrations in and near disputed territory of minority populations with cross-border ties, China’s and India’s status as rising or renascent powers, and alignments with third-party States.
Publication Title
Chinese Journal of Comparative Law
Repository Citation
deLisle, Jacques, "Borderline Sovereignty Disorder: China and the Law and Politics of the China-India Territorial Disputes" (2025). Articles. 539.
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_articles/539
https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxae022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxae022
Publication Citation
13 Chinese J. Compar. L. 22 (2025)