A Reply to Professor Amy Sinden’s Critique of the “Cost-Benefit State”
Process, Chevron, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Regulation Analysis
Graham, John D. and Noe, Paul R., "A Reply to Professor Amy Sinden’s Critique of the “Cost-Benefit State”" (2016). Opinion. 864.
Cost-benefit analysis is the most preferable form of analysis, and it should continue to be employed for important regulatory decisions.