Attorney and Client- Contingent-Fee Contract in Divorce- Connected Property Setlement Held Not Per Se Void as Contrary to Public Policy

Authors

Editors

Publication Date

1964

First Page

278

Document Type

Comment

Repository Citation

Editors Attorney and Client- Contingent-Fee Contract in Divorce- Connected Property Setlement Held Not Per Se Void as Contrary to Public Policy, 113 U. Pa. L. Rev. 278 (1964).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol113/iss2/6