Border walls, abortion, and the death penalty are the current battlegrounds of the right to life. We will visit each topic and more in this paper, as we consider ranking groups of constitutional rights.
The enumerated rights of the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments—life, liberty, and property—merit special treatment. They have a deeper and richer history that involves ranking. Ranking life in lexical priority over liberty and property rights protects life first and maximizes safe liberty and property rights in the absence of a significant risk to life. This is not new law; aspects of it have long appeared in common law and statute. Federal implementation of ranking due process rights, an ordered substantive due process, would protect our most basic and fundamental right and make our entire legal system more humane. By using a conceptual partition between life and other rights, we can create channels of cooperation to solve problems of incommensurability and to provide a more just legal system.
Constitutional law, due process clauses, legal philosophy, public health law, right to life, law & economics, statistical life, substantive due process, significant risk, law & politics, administrative law, feasible risk reduction, safe level of risk imposition, hierarchical interests & rights
Draper, John William, "Preserving Life by Ranking Rights" (2018). Librarian Scholarship at Penn Law. 12.
Administrative Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Social Policy Commons