Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-8-2011
Abstract
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 is widely regarded as the most comprehensive financial regulation reform in the United States since the Great Depression and, in many ways, the modern equivalent of the New Deal in the financial sector. Although it is difficult to assess the practical impact of the Dodd-Frank Act at this early stage in its implementation, this essay offers some reflections on whether the Act lives up to that historical comparison and whether it presents a qualitatively new approach to resolving regulatory challenges posed by today’s financial markets. The essay examines some of the overarching themes built into the foundation of the Act and identifies a few areas in which the Act continues to rely on the old, pre-crisis regulatory principles and assumptions. It concludes that, despite its expansive reach, the Dodd-Frank Act failed to deliver conceptually innovative solutions that could serve as the basis for the twenty-first-century version of the New Deal.
Keywords
Dodd-Frank Act, financial regulation, financial institutions, regulatory reform
Publication Title
North Carolina Banking Institute
Repository Citation
15 N.C. Banking Inst. 83 (2011).