Home > Penn Carey Law Journals > ALR > EALR > Vol. 4 (2009) > Iss. 1 (2009)
Publication Date
Spring 2009
Document Type
Article
First Page
1
Abstract
Since the reform era began in China in 1978, there have been significant changes in the nature and incidence of disputes, conflicts and social disturbances, and the mechanisms for addressing them. We examine three types of disputes: commercial disputes, socio-economic claims and public law (administrative and constitutional law) disputes. Three general patterns stand out: first, the much better performance of institutions for handling disputes in urban areas compared to rural areas; second, the significantly greater progress in handling commercial law disputes compared to socio-economic claims; and third, the more advanced state of administrative law compared to constitutional law.
Repository Citation
Randall
Peerenboom,
&
Xin
He,
Dispute Resolutions in China: Patterns, Causes, and Prognosis,
4
U. Pa. E. Asia L. Rev.
1
(2009).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/ealr/vol4/iss1/4