Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-31-2017
Abstract
Major legislative actions during the early part of the 115th Congress have undermined the central argument for regulatory reform measures such as the REINS Act, a bill that would require congressional approval of all new major regulations. Proponents of the REINS Act argue that it would make the federal regulatory system more democratic by shifting responsibility for regulatory decisions away from unelected bureaucrats and toward the people’s representatives in Congress. But separate legislative actions in the opening of the 115th Congress only call this argument into question. Congress’s most significant initiatives during this period — its derailed attempts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act and its successful efforts to repeal fifteen regulations under the Congressional Review Act — exhibited a startling lack of democratic deliberation. These repeal efforts reveal how the REINS Act would counterintuitively undermine key democratic elements of the current regulatory process by rendering it less transparent and deliberative.
Keywords
Administrative law, regulation, rulemaking, oversight, accountability, legislation, delegation, separation of powers, democracy, deliberation, REINS Act, 115th Congress, Affordable Care Act, ACA, repeal and replace, health law, Congressional Review Act
Publication Title
Administrative Law Review Accord
Repository Citation
Coglianese, Cary and Scheffler, Gabriel, "What Congress's Repeal Efforts Can Teach Us About Regulatory Reform" (2017). All Faculty Scholarship. 1953.
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1953
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, American Politics Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legislation Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Political Theory Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Public Policy Commons
Publication Citation
3 Admin. L. Rev. Accord 43 (2017).